Nike Swoosh Logo vs Newport Cigarettes Swoosh Logo

When you think of ‘swoosh’ what comes first? Nike or Newport Cigarettes?

I should add that for the purposes of comparison, I have rotated the Newport logo 180 degrees, but in it’s own environment it is the other way up.

Everyone likes a bit of potential plagiarism from time-to-time. This is not new news by any stretch of the imagination, but how many people seem to realise how the Nike Swoosh logo resembles the classic Newport Cigarette logo.

Either you know and it’s old news, you know and don’t care, or it’s new news to you. I recall hearing about this a while back, but it left my memory an equally long time ago.

It is however an interesting example of how one brand mark, Nike in this case, is late to the party. That through sheer dominance, exerts it’s brand awareness to a point where no one would even think to question they were not originators of the so called infamous ‘Swoosh’.

In an ideal world, which of course this isn’t, but it it were, the ‘swoosh’ should be referred to as the Newport Swoosh, but personally don’t see that taking off.

Nike and Newport History

It’s a little but more interesting though when you dig around the history of the two companies.

Newport was introduced in 1957, a brand of menthol cigarettes produced by Lorillard Tobacco Company of Greensboro, North Carolina, United States.

Nike was actually formed on January 25, 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports by Bill Bowerman and Philip Knight, and officially became Nike, Inc. in 1978. The Nike swoosh is a logo design created in 1971 by Carolyn Davidson, over a decade after Newport Cigarettes came into being.

So Nike in fact VERY late in using the Newport Swoosh as it’s own brandmark. Interesting that they are in effect total opposites in terms of business focus, both health related, with very different agenda’s.

There is also another interesting fact found on Wikipedia. “During the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, the Discovery Channel displayed a track shoe allegedly worn by U.S. legend Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin. This shoe had on it a prominent symbol appearing identical to the Nike swoosh.

Have tried to track down a photo of this, but so far have failed, but interesting again to see that really, this Nike Swoosh is not so ‘great’, it’s just made great by the sheer power of the people who buy Nike gear. No doubt this mark is a powerful brand icon, it has simplicity and boldness, but it’s far from original. The same could be said for Apple’s logo of course, but that’s another story.

Have also tried to track down any information on the designer of the Newport Swoosh logo, but so far drawn a blank.

What do Nike and Newport have in common

Found this interesting video below on the sameness of the Nike and Newport logo. Via Xplosiveworld.com.

Vintage Newport Advertisement

For some added bonus points, here is a lovely vintage Newport Cigarette advertisement  circa 1970. One of a series of “Newport Men of the Sea”. What a man.

Final thoughts

This whole topic of plagiarism and inspiration is a tricky subject by far. I think many designers at some point have designed something that has proven to exist elsewhere. Their own process of design and brainstorming evolves what to them is a unique idea.

It’s happened to me and I know it’s happened to many others. An idea is not unique, it’s naive to assume that more than one person in the entire world is NOT capable of having the same idea, created from different circumstances and inspiration.

Or that indeed two people on opposite sides of the world both being inspired by something similar and coming up with an almost identical design is again more than possible.

Being inspired on a conscious level is quite different to being inspired on a sub conscious level, where we believe what we are designing is formed from our own creative process, but was in fact inspired by seeing someone long ago, but long forgotten. Until you are faced with that very same original inspiration, brought to you by another designer, along with a comment of  ‘you copied their design’. Your reaction is that you didn’t copy it, but if you allow yourself a moment to consider the possibilities, it dawns on you that yes, you were probably inspired on a sub conscious level. But your actions were not deliberate, yet you get ‘called out’ as a faker.

It’s only through the internet that we are now faced with being ‘caught out’ more than was possible pre internet.



And breathe...

Article Posted On: May 9, 2010 by

Before you rush off somewhere else. If you have found this post useful, I would greatly appreciate it if you would consider signing up to my RSS feed, or Email newsletter. Follow me on Twitter or FaceBook. There are also my prolific postings on Posterous.

Any Stumbles, Tweets, Shares etc would be more that most welcome, convenient share buttons follow.





View Comments

  1. Lawrence says:

    Oh dear. Why didn’t I see this before?

  2. That particular shape from Newport or variations of I’ve seen a few times in the late 90′s and early this decade especially with Technology and IT companies. I wonder how many are still around today….?

    A Star Trek comparison wouldn’t go amiss or am I going to offend Trekies : )

  3. Interesting article, I would be curious to know the process Nike went through to gain a trademark on the ‘swoosh’, seeing that Newport had been using it first according to this article. Granted, it may have been rotated 180 degrees and slightly different in shape, but it’s still very similar. I guess things were different back in 1972, I can’t imagine a brandmark that similar being approved for trademark today, but I could be wrong.
    Paul Galbraith’s First Ever Blog Post …Are there too many Design Blogs?

    • Graham Smith says:

      You are quite right, we seem to be so much more ‘tuned’ into anything that looks like a blatant copy, inspired from or just accidental. It’s a hard time to be a designer now, logo or not. So challenging to be ‘unique’, one persons ‘inspired from’ is another person’s ‘copied from’, seems just as design is subjective, so is plagiarism.

      • With the amount of resource we have at our finger tips, it just gets easier and easier to pull up comparisons even if something was worked on in isolation on a desert island. It does come down to the question “What is original?”

        With regards to trademark I guess both companies working in very different areas helps. Although I do think attitudes were very different then. The paranoia now of having competitors remotely operating in or close to a similar field is crazy but not unfounded. Also given the amount of money spent of legal issues it would be a little harder now with the bigger game players. I guess the winners are always the legal team who probably have a version of the swoosh (same same but different) on their T-shirts with the words “Just done it”

  4. i have a very distinct memory of looking at my friends newport box when i was younger and being confused to why it had the Nike logo on it

Add your own comment

Formatting help | Fields marked * are required

blog comments powered by Disqus