Comments on: Logo Process – Unholy Ladies Undergarments Identity Development http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/ logos designed to work. Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:53:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: Stunning http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-30164 Stunning Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:00:00 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-30164 Sublime! Love it. Sublime! Love it.

]]> By: Ryan http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-23595 Ryan Sat, 03 Jul 2010 04:47:39 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-23595 This one is my favourite This one is my favourite

]]> By: Jaime http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-22105 Jaime Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:07:18 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-22105 I think that's kind of the point. As a male you're going to see it as a woman's underwear from the perspective all men what to be seeing it (and will want to buy their product, since you want to be looking at your significant other from that angle). As a woman you'll see the intricate shape and the 'devilish' and 'feline' traits first, and with the name of the brand will instantly make an association with sexy underwear (which you want to be wearing while your significant other salivates over you). I think that’s kind of the point. As a male you’re going to see it as a woman’s underwear from the perspective all men what to be seeing it (and will want to buy their product, since you want to be looking at your significant other from that angle). As a woman you’ll see the intricate shape and the ‘devilish’ and ‘feline’ traits first, and with the name of the brand will instantly make an association with sexy underwear (which you want to be wearing while your significant other salivates over you).

]]> By: Jaime http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-28380 Jaime Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:07:00 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-28380 I think that's kind of the point. As a male you're going to see it as a woman's underwear from the perspective all men what to be seeing it (and will want to buy their product, since you want to be looking at your significant other from that angle). As a woman you'll see the intricate shape and the 'devilish' and 'feline' traits first, and with the name of the brand will instantly make an association with sexy underwear (which you want to be wearing while your significant other salivates over you). I think that’s kind of the point. As a male you’re going to see it as a woman’s underwear from the perspective all men what to be seeing it (and will want to buy their product, since you want to be looking at your significant other from that angle). As a woman you’ll see the intricate shape and the ‘devilish’ and ‘feline’ traits first, and with the name of the brand will instantly make an association with sexy underwear (which you want to be wearing while your significant other salivates over you).

]]> By: Nina Stössinger http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-21763 Nina Stössinger Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:38:16 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-21763 I saw this a few days ago and had to come back. I think it's enjoyably clever, really very well executed, and works amazingly well to trigger different associations at once. Great stuff. The one thing that's vaguely nagging me about it – as a woman, but maybe also just as me – is the inherently male* perspective. It took me a moment to «see» the between-the-thighs image because uh, as a woman I usually see my underwear from a different perspective. ;-) (*Leaving aside same-sex relationships for the sake of argument/simplicity.) So, dunno, who's the main target audience: is it really mostly guys shopping for something sexy for their SOs to wear – or women shopping for themselves? Mostly, I'd just be very curious if you've received noticeably different reactions from males and females to this design. I saw this a few days ago and had to come back. I think it’s enjoyably clever, really very well executed, and works amazingly well to trigger different associations at once. Great stuff.

The one thing that’s vaguely nagging me about it – as a woman, but maybe also just as me – is the inherently male* perspective. It took me a moment to «see» the between-the-thighs image because uh, as a woman I usually see my underwear from a different perspective. ;-)
(*Leaving aside same-sex relationships for the sake of argument/simplicity.)

So, dunno, who’s the main target audience: is it really mostly guys shopping for something sexy for their SOs to wear – or women shopping for themselves?
Mostly, I’d just be very curious if you’ve received noticeably different reactions from males and females to this design.

]]> By: Nina Stössinger http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-28379 Nina Stössinger Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:38:00 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-28379 I saw this a few days ago and had to come back. I think it's enjoyably clever, really very well executed, and works amazingly well to trigger different associations at once. Great stuff. The one thing that's vaguely nagging me about it – as a woman, but maybe also just as me – is the inherently male* perspective. It took me a moment to «see» the between-the-thighs image because uh, as a woman I usually see my underwear from a different perspective. ;-) (*Leaving aside same-sex relationships for the sake of argument/simplicity.) So, dunno, who's the main target audience: is it really mostly guys shopping for something sexy for their SOs to wear – or women shopping for themselves? Mostly, I'd just be very curious if you've received noticeably different reactions from males and females to this design. I saw this a few days ago and had to come back. I think it’s enjoyably clever, really very well executed, and works amazingly well to trigger different associations at once. Great stuff.

The one thing that’s vaguely nagging me about it – as a woman, but maybe also just as me – is the inherently male* perspective. It took me a moment to «see» the between-the-thighs image because uh, as a woman I usually see my underwear from a different perspective. ;-)
(*Leaving aside same-sex relationships for the sake of argument/simplicity.)

So, dunno, who’s the main target audience: is it really mostly guys shopping for something sexy for their SOs to wear – or women shopping for themselves?
Mostly, I’d just be very curious if you’ve received noticeably different reactions from males and females to this design.

]]> By: Fahad jilani http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-21758 Fahad jilani Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:10 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-21758 Graham Smith great job dude nice font using and tagline quite good but Composition is good :) ...! Graham Smith

great job dude nice font using and tagline quite good but Composition is good :) …!

]]> By: Fahad jilani http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-28378 Fahad jilani Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:00 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-28378 Graham Smith great job dude nice font using and tagline quite good but Composition is good :) ...! Graham Smith

great job dude nice font using and tagline quite good but Composition is good :) …!

]]> By: Graham Smith http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-21727 Graham Smith Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:42:20 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-21727 LOL, well yes. There is that, just glad that someone else mentioned it on my blog and not me... :0) LOL, well yes. There is that, just glad that someone else mentioned it on my blog and not me… :0)

]]> By: ImJustCreative http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-28377 ImJustCreative Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:42:00 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-28377 LOL, well yes. There is that, just glad that someone else mentioned it on my blog and not me... :0) LOL, well yes. There is that, just glad that someone else mentioned it on my blog and not me… :0)

]]> By: Hoof http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-21726 Hoof Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:05:21 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-21726 The 'pussy' association might not be the worst thing ever. The ‘pussy’ association might not be the worst thing ever.

]]> By: Hoof http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-28376 Hoof Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:05:00 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-28376 The 'pussy' association might not be the worst thing ever. The ‘pussy’ association might not be the worst thing ever.

]]> By: brin http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-21715 brin Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:39:26 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-21715 Graham, Everyone will walk away with a different image and wonderment. There can be many interpretations. I see the logo without the eyes above and I do agree without it the logo would lose a lot of interest. One thing for sure--you got people staring at it, upside down, sideways--you got our attention. Still find the eyes creepy but I am still coming back for more. : P Graham,

Everyone will walk away with a different image and wonderment. There can be many interpretations.

I see the logo without the eyes above and I do agree without it the logo would lose a lot of interest.

One thing for sure–you got people staring at it, upside down, sideways–you got our attention.

Still find the eyes creepy but I am still coming back for more. : P

]]> By: brin http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-28375 brin Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:39:00 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-28375 Graham, Everyone will walk away with a different image and wonderment. There can be many interpretations. I see the logo without the eyes above and I do agree without it the logo would lose a lot of interest. One thing for sure--you got people staring at it, upside down, sideways--you got our attention. Still find the eyes creepy but I am still coming back for more. : P Graham,

Everyone will walk away with a different image and wonderment. There can be many interpretations.

I see the logo without the eyes above and I do agree without it the logo would lose a lot of interest.

One thing for sure–you got people staring at it, upside down, sideways–you got our attention.

Still find the eyes creepy but I am still coming back for more. : P

]]> By: brin http://imjustcreative.com/sneek-peek-unholy-ladies-undergarments-logo/2010/02/19/#comment-21714 brin Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:17:19 +0000 http://imjustcreative.com/?p=3871#comment-21714 Look at the negative area. Look at the negative area.

]]>