<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambigram Version of ImJustCreative Logo Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/</link>
	<description>logos designed to work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:53:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Smith</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-18321</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-18321</guid>
		<description>NAGFA: totally appreciate you&#039;re feedback here. You were quite right with the bridge, obvious now when you look at it. Have now changed the design to make it 100% either way.

Love you&#039;re site and you&#039;re portfolio, been looking at them all this morning. Very talented and creative designs there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAGFA: totally appreciate you&#8217;re feedback here. You were quite right with the bridge, obvious now when you look at it. Have now changed the design to make it 100% either way.</p>
<p>Love you&#8217;re site and you&#8217;re portfolio, been looking at them all this morning. Very talented and creative designs there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImJustCreative</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-26440</link>
		<dc:creator>ImJustCreative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-26440</guid>
		<description>NAGFA: totally appreciate you&#039;re feedback here. You were quite right with the bridge, obvious now when you look at it. Have now changed the design to make it 100% either way.

Love you&#039;re site and you&#039;re portfolio, been looking at them all this morning. Very talented and creative designs there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAGFA: totally appreciate you&#8217;re feedback here. You were quite right with the bridge, obvious now when you look at it. Have now changed the design to make it 100% either way.</p>
<p>Love you&#8217;re site and you&#8217;re portfolio, been looking at them all this morning. Very talented and creative designs there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Smith</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-18320</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-18320</guid>
		<description>LUC: Thanks for the comment, I have now created a  revised version, which I hope makes the individual letters more obvious. Noticeably, adding space between the &#039;i&#039; and &#039;j&#039;. What do you think now? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LUC: Thanks for the comment, I have now created a  revised version, which I hope makes the individual letters more obvious. Noticeably, adding space between the &#8216;i&#8217; and &#8216;j&#8217;. What do you think now? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImJustCreative</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-26439</link>
		<dc:creator>ImJustCreative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-26439</guid>
		<description>LUC: Thanks for the comment, I have now created a  revised version, which I hope makes the individual letters more obvious. Noticeably, adding space between the &#039;i&#039; and &#039;j&#039;. What do you think now? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LUC: Thanks for the comment, I have now created a  revised version, which I hope makes the individual letters more obvious. Noticeably, adding space between the &#8216;i&#8217; and &#8216;j&#8217;. What do you think now? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Smith</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-18319</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-18319</guid>
		<description>MAX: Yeah, it&#039;s fun. And I am getting there, slowly. I feel I will actually settle on an ambigram version for the my logo, so now its playing around with the styles to see what better suits. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAX: Yeah, it&#8217;s fun. And I am getting there, slowly. I feel I will actually settle on an ambigram version for the my logo, so now its playing around with the styles to see what better suits. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImJustCreative</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-26438</link>
		<dc:creator>ImJustCreative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-26438</guid>
		<description>MAX: Yeah, it&#039;s fun. And I am getting there, slowly. I feel I will actually settle on an ambigram version for the my logo, so now its playing around with the styles to see what better suits. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAX: Yeah, it&#8217;s fun. And I am getting there, slowly. I feel I will actually settle on an ambigram version for the my logo, so now its playing around with the styles to see what better suits. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nagfa</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-18316</link>
		<dc:creator>nagfa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-18316</guid>
		<description>Clever design.

But a slight flaw rendered it a non-ambigram; the bridge between J and C would be at the bottom when rotated, hence not similar to the &#039;right-oriented&#039; design.

A slight tweak in that could remedy the problem.

We design ambigrams too.
(Would you like one reading I&#039;mJustCreative  ?)

nagfa
Singapore
&quot;p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clever design.</p>
<p>But a slight flaw rendered it a non-ambigram; the bridge between J and C would be at the bottom when rotated, hence not similar to the &#8216;right-oriented&#8217; design.</p>
<p>A slight tweak in that could remedy the problem.</p>
<p>We design ambigrams too.<br />
(Would you like one reading I&#8217;mJustCreative  ?)</p>
<p>nagfa<br />
Singapore<br />
&#8220;p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nagfa</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-26437</link>
		<dc:creator>nagfa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-26437</guid>
		<description>Clever design.

But a slight flaw rendered it a non-ambigram; the bridge between J and C would be at the bottom when rotated, hence not similar to the &#039;right-oriented&#039; design.

A slight tweak in that could remedy the problem.

We design ambigrams too.
(Would you like one reading I&#039;mJustCreative  ?)

nagfa
Singapore
&quot;p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clever design.</p>
<p>But a slight flaw rendered it a non-ambigram; the bridge between J and C would be at the bottom when rotated, hence not similar to the &#8216;right-oriented&#8217; design.</p>
<p>A slight tweak in that could remedy the problem.</p>
<p>We design ambigrams too.<br />
(Would you like one reading I&#8217;mJustCreative  ?)</p>
<p>nagfa<br />
Singapore<br />
&#8220;p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Stanworth</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-18311</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Stanworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-18311</guid>
		<description>Thats pretty clever, i could recognise it straight away too, one day its gunna be like thats it thats the one !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats pretty clever, i could recognise it straight away too, one day its gunna be like thats it thats the one !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Stanworth</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-26436</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Stanworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-26436</guid>
		<description>Thats pretty clever, i could recognise it straight away too, one day its gunna be like thats it thats the one !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats pretty clever, i could recognise it straight away too, one day its gunna be like thats it thats the one !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luc</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-18310</link>
		<dc:creator>luc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-18310</guid>
		<description>well, the I and the C were clearly defined, but i did have to stress a bit to find the J on the logo. other than that, the asymmetrical form does put me on &quot;what?&quot; it feels a bt too unbalanced for me.

hope it helps on the quest ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, the I and the C were clearly defined, but i did have to stress a bit to find the J on the logo. other than that, the asymmetrical form does put me on &#8220;what?&#8221; it feels a bt too unbalanced for me.</p>
<p>hope it helps on the quest ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luc</title>
		<link>http://imjustcreative.com/ambigram-version-of-imjustcreative-logo-redesign/2009/05/18/#comment-26435</link>
		<dc:creator>luc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imjustcreative.com/?p=1681#comment-26435</guid>
		<description>well, the I and the C were clearly defined, but i did have to stress a bit to find the J on the logo. other than that, the asymmetrical form does put me on &quot;what?&quot; it feels a bt too unbalanced for me.

hope it helps on the quest ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, the I and the C were clearly defined, but i did have to stress a bit to find the J on the logo. other than that, the asymmetrical form does put me on &#8220;what?&#8221; it feels a bt too unbalanced for me.</p>
<p>hope it helps on the quest ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: imjustcreative.com @ 2012-02-08 22:13:54 -->
